In recent years, territories have been progressively financialised and commodified. Such deliberation on recent urban renewal are often associated with sense of optimism, perception of good life and happiness. However it is such careful consideration that oversimplify the underlying implication of social, political, spatial and economic relation to those of exclusivity, hierarchical and disconnection. It is clear policies that are implemented in such region only seek to strengthen such phenomenology of isolation.

Rather than the pursuit of an intensified spatial arrangement that such implications are masked and ignored, the project attempts to address these transformations and differences that are provoked via a series of intervention through the architectures of the territory.

Within these multi-layered movement of capital, resources, goods, people and knowledge, the abandoned brownfield sites play a vital role. As the catalyst for urban renewal and developments, these post-industrial landscape forms the device through which such movement can be manifested and regulated.

These urban environments are stripped clean of their industrial past through a calculated tabula rasa manoeuvre in an attempt to maximise its potential monetary returns. Such ambitious projects are displays of an ideological shift that engages the globalisation of cities, industries, people, and infrastructure; meeting and operates through the local space in name of urban rejuvenation.

How can such deliberate act of redevelopment be sustainable to the Nordic model if its intention is imprinted with ideas of separation and profit-generating?

This system of idealized and optimistic projection of urban regeneration operates in the territory that undermines the Model that it represent. Notion of social mobility, good life and happiness are questionable in such territories defined by its violent transformation.

The image of the Nordic territory is made up of numberous moments of tension, inconsistencies and conflict.

To move away from the growing disparity of these distinctive geographies the project put forth the notion territories as a space of operation that can begin to become the platform for moments of interference in existing context of perceive stability.

As the Norwegian coast becomes more integrated and reliant on the oil industry for its towns development. Investment received will only reinforce such dependencies further through its purpose - built infrastructure and industrial elements.

Reduction in oil dependencies of coastal town through provision of alternative mode of exchanges that can first be address through the reorientation of the towns towards the peninsula with the establishment of cross institutional collaboration.

Coastal town that are in decline can be realigned in their industrial orientation through improving infrastructural connection to existing resource towns and further trade connection across the gulf of Bothnia by connecting specific port to relating industry.

The scheme calls an linear formation, one that would consist of a series of functionally specialized parallel sectors. As the region expands, additional growth would be added to the end of each band.

Potentially of introducing rail network to reduce reliance of Norwegian coast dependencies on oil as well corporate control from the south on the Swedish coast.

Realigned growth along the railway line utilising the infrastructure as a delivery backbone where its expansion will be concentrated along its length without getting wider.

A consolidation of city core could be considered where existing boundaries between the core and its immediate limits can be address through the consideration of such spaces.